Dolan’s malarkey

The current bishop of the Archdiocese of New York and former bishop of Milwaukee Timothy Dolan, writing on his blog, The Gospel in the Digital Age, defends the Catholic Church by noting the failures of secular institutions to stop abuse:

You’re familiar with the crescendo of recent stories on the sad and disturbing case of a German priest accused in 1979 of the vicious crime and sin of sexually abusing minor boys.  When these hideous allegations came to the attention of this priest’s archbishop, a man by the name of Joseph Ratzinger — who now happens to be the bishop of Rome, Pope Benedict XVI — he rightly removed the priest and ordered him to report for residential assessment and therapy.

The shock of the original abuse is intensified because, tragically, upon his release from treatment, the priest was reassigned to parish work, although not by Archbishop Ratzinger.  Horribly, as often was the case, the Reverend Peter Hullerman went on to abuse teenagers again.

Sad and sickening, a story all too familiar to us, as we Catholics in the United States have had to face this same ulcer ever so frequently over the last nine years.  Scabs are reopened, anger rekindled, trust painfully restored now being chipped-away-at again, victim-survivors, their families, the vast majority of priests, and faithful Catholics, all hurt anew.

Pope Benedict XVI himself has expressed hurt, anger, sorrow, and contrition.  As Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, and now as Pope, he is seen as one “who gets it” when it comes to the horror of clergy sexual abuse, and who has placed the full force of the Apostolic See, the Vatican, behind efforts to reform.  Who can forget his forthright references to this scourge at least half-a-dozen times in his visit to our country nearly two-years ago, and his moving meeting with victim-survivors?  And now we have his blunt, realistic Pastoral Letter to Ireland on the crises there.  He must be asking, as we all do, “When will it all end.”

So Friday’s headline, only the most recent, stings us again:  “Doctor Asserts Church Ignored Abuse Warnings,” as the psychiatrist who treated the criminal, Dr. Werner Huth, blames the Church for not heeding his recommendations.

–    “Doctor Asserts He Ignored Abuse Warnings,” since Dr. Huth admits in the article that he, in fact, told the archdiocese the abusing priest could be reassigned under certain restrictions, a prescription today recognized as terribly wrong;

–    “Doctor Asserts Public Schools Ignored Abuse Warnings,” since the data of Dr. Carol Shakeshaft concludes that the number of cases of abuse of minors by teachers, coaches, counsellors, and staff in government schools is much, much worse than by priests;

–    “Doctor Asserts Judges (or Police, Lawyers, District Attorneys, Therapists, Parole Officers) Ignored Abuse Warnings,” since we now know the sober fact that no one in the healing and law enforcement professions knew back then the depth of the scourge of abuse, or the now-taken-for-granted conclusion that abusers of young people can never safely work closely with them again.

What causes us Catholics to bristle is not only the latest revelations of sickening sexual abuse by priests, and blindness on the part of some who wrongly reassigned them — such stories, unending though they appear to be, are fair enough, — but also that the sexual abuse of minors is presented as a tragedy unique to the Church alone.

That, of course, is malarkey.  Because, as we now sadly realize, nobody, nowhere, no time, no way, no how knew the extent, depth, or horror of this scourge, nor how to adequately address it.

The sexual abuse of our young people is an international, cultural, societal horror.  It affects every religion, country, family, job, profession, vocation, and ethnic group.

We Catholics have for a decade apologized, cried, reached out, shouted mea culpa, and engaged in a comprehensive reform that has met with widespread acclaim.  We’ve got a long way to go, and the reform still has to continue.

But it is fair to say that, just as the Catholic Church may have been a bleak example of how not to respond to this tragedy in the past, the Church is now a model of what to do. As the National Review Online observes, “. . . the Church’s efforts to come to grips with this problem within the household of faith — more far reaching than in any other institution or sector of society — have led others to look to the Catholic Church for guidance on how to address what is, in fact, a global plague.”

Paul McHugh, an international scholar on this subject at Johns Hopkins University, remarked, “Nobody is doing more to address the tragedy of sexual abuse of minors than the Catholic Church.”

That, of course, is another headline you’ll never see.

It’s understandable why Dolan of all people would be playing a strong defensive. His immediate predecessor, Rembert Weakland, not only failed to remove the molester of over 200 deaf children from ministry, but actually shredded documentation of the serial rapes. Presumably, at least some of Weakland’s employees knew what was going on. Presumably, some of those knowing parties stayed on with the Milwaukee diocese for Dolan’s tenure, and likely made the incoming bishop privvy to information about the scope of abuse and the coverup that wouldn’t come to public attention for some years later. In defending Weakland, Dolan is defending the institution he oversaw and its constituat members, if not himself  directly.

But let us consider the contents of his defense. He rattles off secular authorities who also failed to stop abuse, as if their failures somehow absolves the Church of its responsibility. He basically takes the “Everyone else was doing it!” excuse and flips it into “Nobody else was doing it!”

Then, feigning humility, Dolan passes along the opinion of a disinterested outsider who claims “Nobody is doing more to address the sexual abuse of minors than the Catholic Church itself.” Let’s grant this as true. But if it is true, to our knowledge, no one had done  to cover up the abuses in the first place. And many of the people involved in the conspiracy still maintain cushy jobs and positions of authority. Even if they are doing more than anyone else to address the tragedy, it’s not nearly enough. As Matt Taibbi points out,

[A]s recently as this last decade, the Church’s doctrinal office elected to proceed with church trials for less than 10% of the 3000 cases of abuse reported to them between the years of 2000 and 2010.

Moreover, it will never be enough until everyone–and I do mean everyone–involved in the coverup is punished to the full extent of the law.

Update: In his sermon today, Dolan actually compared the criticism Ratzinger is facing (for activitites of conspiracy and obstruction of justice no one denies) to the persecution suffered by Jesus, claiming the pope “[is] being daily crowned with thorns by groundless innuendo.”

He asked whether the church and the pope “need intense scrutiny and just criticism for tragic horrors long past?”

Unbelievable. Yes. Yes, they do.

Dolan deserves all the protesters he attracts.

Second update: Dolan has opposed extending the statute of limitations in cases of priestly rape. In Dolan’s New York archdiocese, a bishop threatened lawmakers considering a bill to prolong the statute with closure of parishes in their district of the extension passed.


One Response

  1. These priests better hope their god doesn’t exist.

    Hell is going to suck for them.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: