After a nice and (not really) relaxing spring break, we are back, refreshed, and ready to continue some blogtastic discourse.
Last night’s panel (thanks to all those who showed up, by the way!) brought up some interesting questions about women’s involvement in politics. One question I would like to focus on in this post: why is it that women make up less than a quarter of public officials in ALL levels of government (federal, state, local–school boards excepted)?
One of the possible reasons given was that women feel as if they need to prove themselves to a greater extent than men do. For example, men are asked to run based on a “potential for success,” while women need to have a long-established track record of success before they are asked to run. Thus, building women’s confidence and creating strong support networks for female candidates is vital in that first step of encouraging women to run for office.
Another problem comes in terms of voting as well. Women are much more likely to lose elections than men. In numerous, repeated trials, it has been found that voters look at speech transcripts more harshly if the transcript is ascribed to a woman politician, and view the identical transcript as better when a male name is put on it. (This is known as the “Goldberg Paradigm”.)
Another problem is that women need to run multiple times in order to be successfully elected. Since women tend to have less money than men, and are treated horribly by the press, this of course makes women even more hesitant to run in the first place.
Some countries have quotas, but these tend to bring up their own problems, such as resentment toward women and difficulty finding qualified women who are willing to put themselves into a vulnerable public position. Part of me wishes for an affirmative action type of program for political positions, but I doubt that would be as successful as other affirmative action programs have been.
What do you think some solutions might be? Quotas, stricter campaign finance laws, grassroots efforts?
This is an important issue not only in terms of equity but also because when women are in office, issues labeled (often erroneously) as “women’s issues” (they are really “people issues”, but whatevs) such as health care, education, reproductive rights, and other social programs get more attention.
Filed under: politics | Leave a comment »